stringent standards, is there an upper limit for this standard? How can restrictions on people's freedom of business be considered proportional? Third, the reason for the restriction on freedom of business is that the competent authority, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, issued a key point of operation that stipulates that the business premises of the video game arcade industry should comply with the provisions of the self-government regulations, so whether this key point of operation violates the principle of legal reservation and creates the mother law.
Unlimited? From this, we can find that the restriction old picture restoration on freedom of business caused by this case is actually the result of a combination of operation points (licensing and registration should comply with the provisions of autonomous regulations) + autonomous regulations (stricter distance restrictions than central regulations). Reasons for a constitutional conclusion So how did the majority opinion come to the constitutional conclusion? First of all, the reasoning letter addresses the third question. The reasoning letter considers that the main
points of the above work are only to specify the applicable laws and regulations for the application for the issuance of grade certificates or the change of registration, which are detailed and technical regulations, and do not violate the principle of legal reservations. Just like the hierarchical legal reservations proposed in "Interpretation No. 443", only the details and technical secondary matters related to the implementation of the law can be ordered by the competent authority, and will not violate the principle of legal reservations.